Six Common Classroom Management Missteps
We might think of classroom management as having clear, consistent routines and expectations. Or we might perceive classroom management as recognizing off-task behavior and misbehavior early and intervening before it becomes disruptive. We might even think of classroom management simply as the presence of strong, positive relationships and a sense of belonging among students. Of course, these perspectives all play a role in good classroom management.
Nevertheless, there is another element that plays a determinative role in good classroom management: how we choose to teach. The strategies we choose, the interactions we have, and the activities we design can determine when or if our classroom management will proceed smoothly or fly off the rails. Consistency, anticipation, and relationships matter, but strong, engaging, purposeful instruction provides the foundation on which other classroom management elements rely. Consider these six common instruction-related missteps and how to avoid them.
Lack of clarity about the learning objective. When we design learning activities, we have an objective in mind. We select teaching strategies and choose resources and activities to support the learning we seek for our students. However, our purpose and objectives are not always clear to students. When students fail to see the point of our instruction or the activities in which we ask them to engage, they are less likely to invest in learning and are more likely to substitute what they want to do for what we have planned. Beyond being clear and explicit about the purpose of our instruction, we might also have students set goals for their learning. After all, being clear about what students are asked to learn is an important initial step, but having students set goals aligned with the learning objective invites investment and deeper levels of engagement.
Overreliance on a single teaching strategy. We may feel more comfortable and effective with one type of instructional strategy than others. However, too much of anything can diminish its impact. In the case of teaching, variety leads to higher and more consistent levels of attention and engagement. We might combine brief lectures with opportunities for students to discuss what they are learning. We might mix visual, auditory, and kinesthetic inputs and design relevant application activities to provide the variety and breadth of learning necessary to capture and hold students’ attention. Where appropriate, we may even position students to use what they are learning to create, invent, or discover new learning on their own.
Overreliance on cold calling or volunteers. Questions can play an impactful role in learning. They allow us to gauge what students understand and where they are confused. They can invite students to reflect and make sense of what they are learning. Questions can even stimulate new thinking and insights. However, how we present and manage questioning matters. When we rely on volunteers to answer questions, we are likely to hear only from students who are confident and tracking with the lesson, whereas we are not likely to hear from reluctant or confused students or from students who are not paying attention. On the other hand, overreliance on cold calling can place excessive pressure on some students, leading them to worry about being called on rather than listening, engaging, and learning. Generally, a mix of questioning strategies works best, and occasionally, we might even signal a reluctant student privately in advance about a question we will ask so they can be prepared and ready to respond.
Failing to connect content and skills to life beyond the classroom. Relevance is a key driver of learning. The more students can see a connection between what they are learning and other elements or interests in their lives, the more they are likely to commit to learning and recall what they have learned. On the other hand, when students see little relevance in their learning, they are easily distracted, can choose to substitute other behavior for learning, and are likely not to remember much of what they learn.
Assigning group work without providing structure and roles. Well-designed group work and cooperative learning can be effective teaching strategies. However, when students are placed in groups without a clear understanding of what they are to do and learn, without clear roles for group members to perform, or without working norms, group work can become unproductive and chaotic. For group work to be effective and productive, students need to know how to perform as part of a team. We need to provide a clear purpose and provide enough structure for students to engage, without overmanaging or abandoning student groups when they struggle.
Overreliance on tests and quizzes. Obviously, tests and quizzes are important and can be efficient ways of estimating what students know and are ready to learn. Nevertheless, tests and quizzes administered too frequently or that include an excessive number of questions can sacrifice teaching and learning time and lead students to not take them seriously. We need to limit assessments to the minimum number of questions necessary to gain an estimate of what students know and where they may be confused or lacking knowledge. We can also enlist other assessment strategies to gauge student progress without overdependence on tests and quizzes. As examples, we might have students explain a concept, teach another student, demonstrate a skill, or produce a product using what they have learned. As an added benefit, students find many of these additional strategies engaging. They can also help students to consolidate their learning and more effectively store what they have learned in memory.
Admittedly, strong classroom management depends on a variety of factors. However, giving attention to how we plan lessons and engage students in learning can make classroom management easier and more effective.