The Master Teacher Blog

The Master Teacher Blog
Providing you, the K-12 leader, with the help you need to lead with clarity, credibility, and confidence in the ever-evolving world of education.
Browse Topics
When Our Expertise Becomes a Liability

When Our Expertise Becomes a Liability

Expertise is not easy to build. It requires years of study, extensive practice, and sustained focus. Expertise in a content area is built on deep understanding, well-established knowledge constructs, and well-honed schema to address complex problems. Without question, this type of expertise is a great asset.

However, content expertise can also create challenges in our work with students. In fact, in some circumstances, expertise can be a liability. The depth and complexity of what we know can make it difficult to grasp where students are early in their learning journey. We can forget what it was like to be a novice learner.

We must sometimes look beyond our expertise to see what students need and discern how best to meet their needs. Information that seems obvious to us can be anything but obvious to new learners. We can make assumptions that overlook important information and procedural components for early learning. We can underestimate the time, effort, and support students will require. Let’s examine six times when our expertise ceases to be an asset and instead becomes a liability.

Expertise can reduce flexibility. Students come with varied levels of background knowledge and readiness to learn. They often require varied learning experiences and pacing to succeed. However, the process of honing a skill can lead to overreliance on a single method—a method that has worked for the teacher. High levels of competence can lead to overdependence on a strategy or practice that has seemed to work well in the past.  

Antidote: Consider what students need before choosing a strategy or approach.  

Expertise can result in high expectations without support. Years of experience and gained expertise can lead to assumptions about how easily a skill or concept can be learned. Consequently, important scaffolding elements can be overlooked, leaving students struggling to understand key steps and gain insights crucial to learning success. 

Antidote: Listen carefully to students’ questions, identify recurring areas of struggle, and offer scaffolding where needed.  

Expertise can create instructional blind spots. Expertise is a result of extensive practice that leads to automated skills. High levels of expertise can lead to ignoring key initial learning elements, overlooking misconceptions learners hold, and presenting information in “chunks” too large for students to digest.  

Antidote: Adopt a beginners mindset. Imagine having no knowledge or experience when planning steps and sequences to build learning paths.  

Expertise can generate overconfidence. With expertise comes a deserved level of confidence. However, too much confidence can inhibit reflection, create resistance to feedback, and result in reluctance to innovate. Certainty can be both a gift and a curse.  

Antidote: Balance (deserved) confidence with humility.  

Expertise can underestimate emotional barriers. Student experiences play significant roles in their learning. Past trauma, current worries, and anxieties about the future can all affect what students learn and how well they learn it. Cultural context and personal perceptions matter. The best instructional strategies and deepest content knowledge may not overcome the barriers that students’ emotions can pose to their learning.   

Antidote: Be open, sensitive, and considerate of the emotions students may be experiencing when designing and facilitating learning activities.  

Expertise can unintentionally create cognitive overload. Experts tend to think in large informational and conceptual chunks. They understand relationships and sequences. However, students often experience new learning content as disconnected elements. Their working memory can quickly and easily be overwhelmed. When working memory is overloaded, little learning occurs, and even less is remembered. 

Antidote: Break information and processes into small elements, provide schema and graphic representations, and ensure adequate time for reflection and application of new learning. 

Content expertise can be a great gift to our teaching. It can also get in the way if we come to rely too heavily on what we know over what students need. The challenge is to embrace our expertise while remembering what it felt like to be a novice learner. When we inject humility, empathy, and curiosity into our teaching and relationships with students, we both become more successful.

Six Strategies to Inspire the Next Generation of Teachers

Six Strategies to Inspire the Next Generation of Teachers

Few schools across the nation have all the teachers they need and can be confident that they will have a wealth of quality candidates for future openings. Too few of today’s young people are choosing teaching as a career to fill current and future needs, which means that we need to do all that we can to make teaching and other education roles attractive and rewarding. Despite their importance, these steps will fall short if young people are not exposed to and supported to choose teaching as a career.  

Research points to the reality that tomorrow’s teachers are sitting in our classrooms today. Most teachers in most schools grew up near where they began their teaching careers. It follows that if we can interest and support students with high potential and an inclination toward teaching to explore what it means to teach, we are more likely to have the quality, number, and variety of teaching candidates we need and seek. However, we must do more than occasionally encourage students to think about teaching. An intentional, comprehensive, and varied approach is required—that's where Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs can be so immensely valuable. Here are six strategies to consider and build on.  

Offer a paraeducator certification program.  

A structured program that leads to paraeducator/paraprofessional certification can give students a strong foundation in various aspects of learning and working with learners. Mini courses on topics such as child development, effective classroom practices, and the science of learning can provide a solid foundation for students to serve as paraeducators while also helping them see themselves as future teachers. Observing and assisting in classrooms can also give students an intimate experience of teaching as both a role and a career. Experience as paraeducators also positions students to observe teaching from a perspective other than as a student. Further, a structured program can expose students to the thinking and decision-making processes of professional teachers.  

Provide paid internships and apprenticeships.  

Roles such as classroom aides, summer teaching assistants, and after-school tutors can offer authentic opportunities for students to “try on” teaching roles. Having the experiences paid for also adds value and responsibility to them. Internships and apprenticeships can also expose students to a wide range of challenges and experiences that reflect what it means to be a teacher  

Create opportunities for students to engage in micro- and peer-teaching.  

Some less-intensive options for students to experience what it means to teach can be attractive to students who are curious about teaching and want to try it out but either do not have time for or are not yet ready for more intensive experiences. Micro- and peer-teaching also entail lower investment and risk for students who are curious but unsure of their interests  

Offer dual credit courses to give students a college head start.  

Courses that offer high school and college credit can be a great option for students who are certain that teaching is in their future. Not only are students exposed to more advanced content and skills, but credits earned prior to college enrollment can reduce tuition costs and build momentum for students’ preparation for a career in teaching 

Offer mentorships with strong, supportive, and inspiring teachers.  

Having opportunities to engage with and learn from someone who is passionate about and an expert in their work can help students gain a positive, realistic view of what it means to teach. Mentors can also advise students on areas of experience and learning that will help them to be better prepared for teaching as a profession.  

Sponsor a future teacher club.  

Clubs for students interested in teaching were once common in schools. However, their popularity has waned over the past few decades. Nevertheless, an organization designed around student interests, with opportunities for student leadership and experiences that students find appealing, can support students considering a career in teaching. Students might engage in activities such as lesson design, visiting and observing classes, hosting teacher panels, and conducting interviews. Participation in a future teacher club can also give students a sense of identity and stimulate pride in their career interest 

The truth is that tomorrow’s teachers are sitting in today’s classrooms waiting to be noticed, nurtured, and prepared. When they have meaningful opportunities to experience teaching, learn from skilled mentors, and see the impact they can have on others, something magical happens: Teaching shifts from something they observe to a future they can imagine.

Beyond Hand Raising: Smarter Ways to Ask Questions

Beyond Hand Raising: Smarter Ways to Ask Questions

We employ questions throughout lessons to gain feedback on our instruction, surface areas of confusion and misconception, and to support classroom management. Having students respond to questions is a useful strategy for understanding what background knowledge they bring and what they are learning in real time. Questions can also be used to ensure that students are paying attention.  

Of course, we want our questions to be well-framed, meaningful, and revealing of what students are absorbing and can explain. However, how we pose questions also has implications for the information we gain and the psychological comfort students experience. For example, when students are wondering whether they are about to be called upon, they may pay more attention. When students have time to reflect and prepare answers, they are more likely to respond with information that better reflects their thinking and learning.  

Obviously, there are many ways to manage the process of asking questions. Each approach can serve a purpose and has advantages and disadvantages. And each varies in the amount of preparation allowed to students, the predictability with which questions are presented, and the amount of emotional safety students experience.  

The three most common questioning strategies are cold calling, warm calling, and signal calling. Let’s examine these three popular strategies, what they offer, and the drawbacks they can present.  

Cold calling involves asking students questions without a specific, individual warning that they may be called upon. Teachers may pause a lesson to ask questions or set aside time after a lesson or activity for students to respond. The purpose of this approach is to keep students cognitively engaged in anticipation of being asked a question. It also allows for random checking of understanding and prevents a few students from dominating participation. Cold calling can also be used to hold students accountable and gain the attention of students who appear not to be paying attention. While this approach offers opportunities for feedback and management, it can negatively affect students' emotional safety, especially those who need time to reflect and prepare before sharing their thinking. It can also be a source of anxiety and embarrassment that pushes against authentic engagement and “full-bodied” learning.  

Strategies to make cold calling effective: 

  • Ensure a warm and respectful tone in questioning and follow-up. 

  • Respond with interest and curiosity to incorrect responses. 

  • Offer supportive prompts to nudge and expand responses in a productive direction. 

  • Treat mistakes as a natural part of learning and a step toward understanding. 

  • Avoid overuse of cold calls to maintain attention and manage other behaviors.   

Warm calling is a softer, more supportive approach to questioning. Typically, students are given time and activities to help them prepare to answer questions. As examples, students may take a minute to make notes or consult with classmates before being expected to respond. This approach shares accountability with cold calling, but involves less risk-taking, lower threat, fewer non-responses, and increased student confidence. For many students, this approach leads to deeper and more complete responses. It can also support shy, less confident, and struggling students to feel more successful. Further, the additional thinking time and rehearsal increase retention of new learning.  

Strategies to make warm calling effective: 

  • Allocate adequate, but not excessive, time for reflection and preparation. 

  • Pose questions that are more complex and require more reflective and analytical thinking than might be presented when cold calling.  

  • Offer response preparation strategies that maintain individual accountability while also mining memories and stimulating deep thinking.  

  • Press for more complete responses than might be acceptable when cold calling. 

  • Monitor to ensure that a small group of students does not dominate preparation activities and response opportunities.  

Signal calling, as the name implies, involves visible indicators to assess and assign question response activities. Signaling might be used to indicate who is confident and ready to respond, or who is uncertain or needs more time. This approach also provides real-time feedback on how well students are tracking with the lesson. Signal calling features accountability, but in this context, students share information about their learning and readiness during the activity. A variety of signaling techniques can be employed. Students might use hand signals such as thumbs up/thumbs down/thumbs sideways or “fist-to-five” confidence ratings to signal their readiness. They might use colored cards, whiteboards, or other strategies. Information students provide can guide choices about which students might be selected to respond. 

Strategies to make signal calling effective: 

  • Keep signal choices simple and clear to avoid confusion. 

  • Explore student signals that reflect uncertainty or confusion to determine causes. 

  • Balance response distribution to avoid having only confident students respond. 

  • Monitor signals to ensure that students are not “hiding” or following peer responses to avoid thinking independently. 

  • Combine signal-calling with follow-up questions to examine the depth of understanding and readiness to move forward.  

The three questioning strategies discussed all present advantages and disadvantages depending on the type of learning involved and our purpose in presenting questions. In general, signal calling works best to gauge student readiness. Warm calling supports deeper participation. Cold calling can maintain engagement and accountability. The key is to match the strategy we choose with the purpose of our instruction and the learning-related information we need. 

Before Teaching Content, Teach Students How to Learn

Before Teaching Content, Teach Students How to Learn

We want our students to be successful learners. We also want to experience success as we teach students. Unfortunately, students do not always come to us with the attitudes and skills that make them proficient learners. Trying to teach students who lack an understanding of how learning happens and how to be successful learners can be a challenging and exhausting experience.  

We have a choice: We can ignore the understanding and skills students lack, or we can help them to build the learning capacity necessary to become better learners. Fortunately, there are several accessible and effective strategies and insights we can share with students to start them on a more successful learning journey. Equally important, we can teach many of these lessons in the context of daily routines and the required curriculum.  

Here are six research-based and practice-proven learning insights to help students strengthen their learning and expand their capacity to succeed in school and in life. Key insight: If we position the insights and skills that build learning capacity in the context of helping students rather than class requirements, students are often more accepting and more readily adopt these practices. We might even frame behaviors that support learning as experiments and games to prove their worth.  

First, teach students how learning changes the brain. Students are often not aware of how experiences, repetition, feedback, and even failed attempts change the way their brain functions. New experiences, insights, and skills create neural connections and strengthen existing ones. The more often these connections are activated, the stronger, more efficient, and more durable they become. The brain pays attention to repetition, so practice is a great way to grow brain capacity. Focused, deliberate practice, followed by feedback and subsequent adjustments, grows the brain’s capacity and can make future learning more efficient 

Second, help students understand the role of attention in learning. We might assume that students understand that paying attention is a primary driver of learning, yet too often, this is not the case. Attention is the gateway to learning and the doorway to memory. In the absence of attention, little or no learning is likely to happen. Students can increase their attention skills by employing strategies such as eliminating distractions, focusing on one attention-demanding task at a time, asking questions, and predicting what happens next in lessons, stories, and other learning activities. We might also have students monitor their attention and challenge themselves to gradually lengthen the time they can stay fully attentive and engaged.  

Third, instruct students about how their memory functions. The truth is that forgetting is normal. It is not a sign of failure. However, memory can be strengthened and lengthened. When students frequently return to previously learned information and skills, they become more deeply embedded in their memory. Retrieval practicewhere students attempt to recall everything they remember about a topic or processrefreshes their memory and lengthens their recall. They might explain ideas in their own words. Or they might connect new ideas and content to prior learning. Engaging in memory challenges is far more effective than passive review.  

Fourth, explain the value of productive struggle. Students often assume that if they struggle as they learn, they must not be good learners. Yet learning that is easy often does not stay with students long. When students must struggle to grasp a concept or develop a skill, they are more likely to retain it once learned. Mistakes are also a natural part of learning, and they represent information the brain uses to improve future performance. We can counsel students to think “not yet” when they struggle rather than “not possible.” We might also remind them that confusion and struggle often happen just before understanding and success. 

Fifth, coach students to focus on getting better, not just getting it right. We can remind students that learning is a process, not a performance. Students often do their best when they think about learning as a journey, not a one-time effort and demonstration. Challenging learning more often follows a path of iteration and approximation than a track of error-free certainty. We can help students set learning goals and monitor their progress. We might even encourage students to interrogate their learning: What strategy worked well? What mistakes helped me to learn? What should I practice more or next? 

Sixth, nurture the skill of metacognition. The value of the previous five learning skills is enhanced when students learn to monitor their own thinking. Metacognition gives students the power to become their own best teacher. We might teach students to ask themselves: What do I understand about this topic or skill, and where do I still need to do more? Can I explain or teach this information to someone else? Where am I confused? What strategy might work better than the one I have used? Metacognition is a skill that positions students to regulate their attention, manage their effort, choose the best strategy, and take ownership and control of their learning.  

These skills help students not only be successful in our class, but they also can be life changing. Students begin to see themselves as self-directed, capable, independent learners. When students possess and practice these skills, they can also become easier and more delightful to teach. 

Five Practices to Build Early-Year Momentum

Five Practices to Build Early-Year Momentum

Once the school year is underway, we face the challenge of establishing routines, setting a pace, and creating a rhythm to carry our instruction and, by extension, student learning forward. We may be eager to introduce the curriculum and move forward with what we have to share with students, but success with these priorities depends on creating a solid context and processes to support what lies ahead. 

A successful launch to the new year will require some patience, discipline, and focus from us. Time spent in the first weeks of school helping students practice routines, develop confidence, and refresh their learning can make our work with students in the coming weeks and months significantly more successful. Let’s review five start-of-the-year practices that can position our students and us for success in the year ahead. 

Observe before expecting. We may have ideas and hold assumptions about what students should know and be able to do, but we must remember that what students bring to our classroom may vary widely due to a number of factors. Some students may not have fully grasped past learning or may have forgotten much of what they have learned. They may have had a summer filled with distractions and trauma. Or they may have engaged in activities that accelerated their knowledge and built new skills. The truth is that students will begin the year where they are, not where we expect or want them to be. By taking time to observe what students know, how they behave, and what they may be ready to learn, we can gain insights that inform our planning and guide our instruction in the coming weeks.  

Prioritize progress over perfection. We want students to find success. Yet, we need to remember that learning is a journey. Perfection may be a goal, but expecting perfection can be a recipe for frustration and disappointmentfor our students and for us. The gap between where students are and where they are going will be closed by effort and progress. We need not lose sight of where we want to take students, but we must be realistic about the length and nature of the journey. Prioritizing progress is a better strategy than expecting perfection, especially in the first few weeks.  

Go slow to go fast. The beginning of the new year, those first few weeks when we meet and begin getting to know our students, is the time to focus on building a foundation for the rest of the year. Relationships built in the initial weeks can create a foundation of trust and reassurance that can prevent future resistance and conflict while building cooperation and commitment. Time spent refreshing concepts and renewing skills can save time and frustration later as students encounter more complex ideas and build new capacities. We may worry that we are off to a slow start, but momentum fueled by confidence and competence can easily make up for lost time.  

Repeat to automate. Students do their best when they know what is expected and when they are comfortable and confident with routines. We may think that a few repetitions should be adequate for students to learn and follow daily procedures, but when students are still trying to find their place and hoping to fit in, this type of learning can take longer than we expect. Rather than place a number on how many times we will explain and repeat, we might continue until students no longer need reminding. While getting started may take longer than we anticipate, well-established routines and expectations can pay rich dividends as the year unfolds.  

Assume positive efforts and intentions. Student behavior in the opening weeks may be erratic and unpredictable. Some students will withdraw until they feel a sense of belonging. Other students will act out and even be defiant until they feel assured in their relationship with us. Still others may test our boundaries and expectations until they are confident that we are serious and will follow through. In response to these varying and sometimes confusing behaviors, seeking to understand the reasons behind the behaviors we see will be more productive than drawing premature conclusions or assuming the worst of students. Unfortunately, when what we assume and expect is negative, we are more likely to encounter more negativity. Students often need time and a fresh start. We can help by assuming students’ intentions are positiveor at least suspending judgment until we have more experience with them.  

There is much to do and think about in the initial weeks of the new school year. We might find ourselves wanting to immediately launch into the curriculum and leave relationship building, routines, and expectations for later, yet this is usually a mistake. Trying to correct and undo unacceptable and unproductive behaviors and processes usually takes more time and effort than establishing a strong foundation from the beginning. 

Six Ways to Help Students Connect School to Their Future

Six Ways to Help Students Connect School to Their Future

Because many (if not most or all) educators also consider themselves to be lifelong lovers of learning, it’s only natural that we want to believe that students inherently understand why school is important and that what they learn in school holds value. Yet, the evidence suggests something different. Too many students see school as something they must get through to get on with life rather than an experience that will take them where they want to go.  

Every time a student asks, “Why do we have to learn this?” “When will I ever use this?” and “Is this going to count?” we are likely being presented with evidence that students do not see their school experience as valuable, purposeful, or alignment with their goals. As a result, their motivation too often remains largely untapped, their engagement is generally limited to what is demanded, and their commitment becomes driven by external rewards and meaningless symbols. 

On the other hand, when students connect their school experience to their interests and see it as purposeful and aligned with their goals, their motivation and engagement grow. Their commitment and persistence become stronger, and learning becomes a higher priority.  

The challenge we face is to employ strategies and approaches that help students to make the crucial connection between what they are asked to learn and what is important, interesting, useful, or worthwhile to them. The task is not easy, nor will the same strategies and approaches work in the same way or for every student. We need a variety of options and alternatives to make the connection in response to students' needs. Here are six strategies we can tap, test, and refine to take on the challenge. 

Learn and tap into student aspirations.  

If we hope to have students see alignment between their goals and in-school learning, we need to start where our students are. We need to understand their hopes, aspirations, interests, and desired identity. For example, they may like making things, helping others, leading teams, solving problems, or earning money. Of course, these elements may change over time, but taking time to ask students about what they hope for in life, the work they enjoy, the skills they are interested in, and who they hope to become can provide a rich context and anchors for learning.    

Frequently return to “Why does this matter?”  

When students do not understand the value and purpose of what they are learning, they typically default to what “will count” as a grade. Students need us to choose learning that matters and help them to see why. Frequently reminding students of the importance and real-world application of what they are learning can build stronger bridges between student goals and their school experience.  

Help students see possibilities for skill transfer.  

The more students understand how what they are learning in one class might be helpful in another or in life beyond school, the more likely they are to invest the time and effort to learn it. Broadening our explanation and discussion of what students are learning to include skills such as critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity, persistence, and other crucial life skills opens doors to examples of how these skills can be applied in contexts beyond the current lesson or unit of study. Supplementing the discussion with examples of how these skills are used in a variety of settings and professions can further help students to make meaningful connections.  

Reinforce links between today’s choices and future opportunities.  

Students often struggle to link the decisions they make today to how those decisions will affect their future options and opportunities. One way to assist students in grasping this concept is to help them create an “if-then” chain. For example, if they do quality work today, success in their courses becomes more likely. If they succeed in their courses, then graduation is a higher probability and post-graduation options grow. If they create more post-graduation options, then they open more career opportunities. And if they have access to more career opportunities, then success with personal goals becomes more likely. Another approach is to emphasize to students the importance of consistently doing just one more thing than required. Over time, the difference between what would have been and what is possible grows in the same way that investing money creates even more money in the future.  

Connect learning to experiences of successful adults.  

Adults in the community, famous people, and even historical figures can serve as examples and reinforcers of the importance and value of what students are learning and the achievement of their goals. Consider inviting successful adults from the community to share their stories and examples of how what students are learning is important to their success in life. Similarly, we might share examples of how people whom students see as successful depend on the skills students are learning, which can reinforce connections to their goals. Further, selecting and highlighting historical figures who demonstrated habits and skills students are learning, and how they made them successful, can reinforce the alignment between students’ goals and in-school learning.  

Link learning to future identity.  

Helping students think about how they want to be seen and what they want to accomplish in the future can create opportunities for important discussions. We can remind students that success can be defined in multiple ways and that it can take many paths. What is most important is that they avoid closing doors they may want to reopen later and that they create and protect as many options in life as possible. 

We want students to see school as a place where they can build the knowledge, skills, habits, and character to pursue their goals and find success in life, not a collection of disjointed, disconnected, and distracting experiences. When they do, they become less dependent on external rewards and meaningless symbols and more focused on experiences that make them better people and prepare them for a better future. 

Share Your Tips & Stories

Share your story and the tips you have for getting through this challenging time. It can remind a fellow school leader of something they forgot, or your example can make a difficult task much easier and allow them to get more done in less time. We may publish your comments.
Send Us An Email
Six Assumptions That Can Shortchange Learning

Six Assumptions That Can Shortchange Learning

Our assumptions can have a powerful influence on what we see, how we interpret, and how we respond to what happens in our classroom and our interactions with students. When our assumptions are correct, this process can increase efficiency and improve our effectiveness. Unfortunately, when our assumptions are incorrect, they can launch a narrative that can lead to misunderstanding, misdiagnosis, and unproductiveand even harmfulresponses. 

We might think of our assumptions as stories we tell ourselves that can drive our beliefs and actions. We carry them with us in our interactions, decisions, and relationships. These narratives are typically shaped by what we have been told, our experiences, our perceptions of students, and our perspective on our work. 

We need to be aware of assumptions we hold, regularly test them, and be willing to adjust them when they fall short. Here are seven of the most common assumptions that can get in the way of our success with students. Do any of these assumptions sound familiar? 

I must be in control, or students will not learn.  

This story assumes that learning is based on compliance. In fact, quality learning requires students to build ownership and engage in sense-making. These are processes that we can facilitate, but students must perform for themselves. When students have choices and a voice in learning, they are more likely to develop understanding, agency, and recall. Learning over which students feel no control tends not to be deep, nor is it retained for very long. 

Good teaching means that students should not struggle.  

This assumption sets a very high, even unrealistic standard for teaching. In fact, even if we meet it, we may not be doing a learning favor for students. Learning that comes too easily is often forgotten quickly. Struggle is often a key element in learning that is deep and lasting. We need to be ready to coach, guide, and support students in their learning, but preventing them from any struggle can deprive students of experiencing learning in ways that make it durable, transferable, and retainable. 

These students do not care.  

It may be that students are not responding to the way in which learning is being presented, or it may be that something is getting in the way. Though some of it certainly is, not all student disengagement is apathy. In fact, it may be a signal that something is interfering. What we are seeing might be confusion, uncertainty, or evidence of being overwhelmed. Of course, it might be a signal that students are not connecting with the content or our approach. Fortunately, we can adjust either or both factors. While we may not reach every student every day, we can do our best to maintain high expectations and use what we know about our students to position learning for the best chances of success. 

These students cannot handle challenging work. 

This statement is more likely to reflect our judgment than students’ capacity to learn. Our expectations matter. When we hold high expectations and support students to meet them, they are more likely to do so. On the other hand, if we lower our expectations, we risk not exposing students to learning that is deep and rich. We deprive them of the possibility of achieving more than they have in the past. We also risk underestimating our potential to lift the learning of our students to new and expected heights.  

I must cover all the content. 

This assumption prioritizes pacing over understanding. Coverage does not usually lead to competence, and superficial exposure does not lead to learning success. Time and curriculum requirements are certainly pressures teachers face, despite us knowing that choosing to prioritize coverage risks fragile learning and quick forgetting. A better choice is to decide what learning is essential, or at least the highest priority, and focus on those concepts and skills, even if it means some other content might not be addressed. 

This is the way I have always done this, so it must work. 

This statement falls back on tradition as a predictor of correctness. In fact, the first part of this statement may be correct, but it does not mean that the second part is also. Just because something worked in the past does not mean that it is the best approach today. The students we are teaching may have changed. Expectations may have shifted. Or some other factor may have been altered. The key is to focus on the needs, readiness, and characteristics of the students in front of us and ask what will work for them. 

We want our students to succeed. We also want to be confident in our ability to make their success possible. Consequently, we need to be thoughtful about the assumptions we make and their impact on our teaching and our students learning. Are there other assumptions you would add to this list? If so, what impact might they have on students and learning? 

Five Times Memorization Will Help Learning—and Five Times It Won’t

Five Times Memorization Will Help Learning—and Five Times It Won’t

Traditionally, memorization has played a significant role in the history of formal learning. Students were expected to memorize a wide variety of facts, terms, formulas, and other elements that adults deemed important to be recited. To some extent, memorization was especially important because students, during their education and later, did not always have immediate access to a wide range of information relevant to their success. Memorization was also seen as a key intellectual pursuit. Being able to recite poetry, significant quotes, and literary passages was considered a sign of an educated person and evidence that someone values and respects culture 

The omnipresence of information today calls into question the role of memorization in education. The ability to recall and recite information and quote from important statements and writings of the past conveys a level of exposure and attention to what is historically significant. Having immediate access to some information, even when it can be obtained with little effort, remains useful.  

The key question is whether memorization still has a place in formal learning. If so, what role should it play and when? Conversely, when does memorization not have a role, and when should it be assigned a lower priority? Let’s explore five times when memorization continues to be beneficial to learning and five occasions when it is best to avoid or not require it. 

Times when memorization can be useful and important: 

  • Building mental muscle memory. Some elements of learning need to be immediately available for recall. As examples, emergency and safety procedures, musical notes, and grammatical rules benefit from immediate access. Memorizing can free up working memory to focus on urgent and important elements and actions.  

  • Learning important terms and concepts. Students often need to know key vocabulary words to engage in some types of learning. Memorizing procedures, processes, formulas, and terms is crucial for most complex, scientific, and technical activities. Unless students are familiar with key terms, time can be lost searching for definitions and building understanding.  

  • Creating processing efficiency. Memorization can create brain space for higher-order thinking such as analysis, synthesis, and problem solving. Automaticity frees up mental bandwidth. For example, confidence with basic math facts can free up attention to focus on more complex operations.  

  • Constructing foundational understanding. Memorization can be the foundation for critical thinking. It can function much like scaffolding, providing support for higher-level mental activities. Memorized core principles and parameters can create anchor points to support complex concepts and ideas.  

  • Recognizing and using patterns. Memorization can build confidence and offer empowerment for performing complex tasks. Understanding patterns can stimulate curiosity. Seeing patterns can also lead to deeper insight and recognition when something does not fit or is incorrect.  

Occasions when memorization should be avoided, or at least given a lower priority: 

  • Interpreting experience and sifting information. Sense-making is an important learning element. Memorizing a procedure or formula without understanding why it works and how to apply it accomplishes little. Being able to recite a definition without understanding its implications or significance is of limited value to understanding or solving a problem.  

  • Seeking original thinking or creativity. Memorized information can provide context for creativity and serve as a launch point for original thinking. However, creativity and original thinking require more depth, flexibility, and judgment than memorization typically can offer.  

  • Building learning transfer. Information memorized for one purpose can be inadequate for another. For example, memorizing specific types of math problems can ignore the importance of learning strategies, and relying on writing templates can distract from the importance of addressing the purpose of communication and the intended audience.  

  • Exercising judgment and navigating moral dilemmas. Memorization can provide structure and parameters for behavior, but making important decisions and finding a path through complex and conflicting options calls for more than a list of rules or a checklist of items.  

  • Developing declarative learning skills. Facts, formulas, procedures, and vocabulary can help to frame higher-level work. But activities such as scientific inquiry, collaboration and discussion, artistic techniques, and other complex and creative activities require a level of thinking and understanding beyond what can be memorized 

We might think of memorization as a useful tool to assist learning rather than a goal to achieve. Memorization can help to filter, sort, retain, and apply information. It can also be a path to processing efficiency, a launch point for complex thinking, and a context for creativity. 

In addition to asking yourself when memorization is an appropriate learning goal, consider the following activities to broaden the scope of this conversation: Teachers, ask your students where they see the most value in memorization; you might need to guide them toward seeing examples in their everyday lives. Administrators, ask your teachers where they see the most value in memorization and how they can frame tasks that ask students to memorize information.

Recognize and Avoid These 7 Common Teaching Fallacies

Recognize and Avoid These 7 Common Teaching Fallacies

Teaching is complex work, and we—like all professionals—use shortcuts to manage the complexity. We make assumptions and form judgments in real time, even when we may not have complete information. We use observations and clues to assess and adjust our instruction and anticipate and manage behavior. However, sometimes what we think we are seeing is not what is actually happening.

The cues and strategies on which we depend can be flawed, and priority choices we make may be limiting the learning we intend. We might think of these common assumptions, perceptions, and conclusions as teaching fallacies. They may be practiced with good intentions, but they can still get in the way of learning. Let’s explore seven common teaching misconceptions, the consequences they can produce, and how we might overcome them.  

The compliance fallacy. 
Students may be quiet and doing as they are told. They may be looking at us and following instructions. Yet, what we are saying may be going in one ear and out the other. It is said that we can demand our students’ presence in seats, but learning is voluntary. Compliance might be a starting point, but learning that is captured and retained is more likely to result when students find relevance, utility, and meaning in what they are learning. The resulting commitment is a far better path to learning than demanded compliance. 

Insight: Learning requires a level of structure and order, but compliance is often not adequate for learning to occur. Learning requires interaction, reflection, and sensemaking—actions not assured when compliance is the only driver. 

The activity fallacy. 
Learning often comes through activities. However, not all activities result in learning. Students may participate in enjoyable experiences without learning and may be active without gaining insight and understanding. The experiences we design for students must begin with a focus on and lead to learning. If they don’t, they serve little purpose.  

Insight: Activities need to serve learning, not just entertain. Worthy activities are tightly tied to, support, and lead to learning outcomes. 

The engagement fallacy. 
We might think that if students are smiling, looking at us, and participating, then they must be learning. Yet, multiple studies have shown that adults tend to significantly overestimate student engagement. In fact, students are often skilled at looking engaged when their minds are a million miles away. On the other hand, students who may not appear to be engaged may be thinking deeply, considering implications, and making connections in their learning. 

Insight: We must do more than assume engagement based on nonverbal signals. Checking for understanding, structuring active participation, and asking for feedback can offer more reliable evidence. 

The learning retention fallacy. 
If students understand today’s lesson, we might think we can move forward with confidence that they will be able to remember and use what they have learned. However, this can be a flawed assumption. Initial learning may have yet to be transferred into long-term memory and, consequently, can quickly be lost.

Insight: We need to follow new learning up with opportunities for students to practice and develop long-term recall if we want them to retain what they learn. 

The first idea fallacy. 
We can become overly enamored with the first idea we have, what feels like an obvious solution, or an action that will release the pressure we feel. Yet, ignoring alternatives, overlooking assumptions, failing to iterate, and discounting implications can be expensive in time, effort, and outcomes. This approach stymies our creativity, limits our flexibility, and can deprive us of promising alternatives that would better serve the needs of our students. 

Insight: Taking time to consider alternatives, explore options, and press our thinking can make the difference between just pushing through and finding new ideas, fresh approaches, and solutions that best serve our goals. 

The gut feeling fallacy. 
Intuition can be accurate, but it can also ignore factors that are not apparent or known to us. We can risk losing time and wasting energy when we rely on our gut feelings alone. We can even make the situation worse when we depend on perceptions and assumptions over data and evidence. Of course, solid evidence is not always available to us, and sometimes we have no alternative than to fall back on our gut feelings. However, we need to be cautious and avoid overdependence on what we assume when we really do not know. 

Insight: Intuition can be useful in many circumstances. However, gut feelings informed by evidence hold the greatest promise for finding answers and designing interventions. 

The coverage fallacy. 
We may feel pressure to cover everything in the curriculum, especially as the end of the grading period, semester, or school year looms. However, hurrying through concepts, skimming over content, and lightly touching skills accomplishes little when learning is our goal. We may need to prioritize and even skip some elements. However, if the time we recoup results in the learning of important concepts, content, and skills, the tradeoff will be well worth it.

Insight: Remember that what counts most is what students learn, not what we teach. Pacing matters, but pacing needs to respond to learning progress, not just the week of the year. 

Many of these fallacies may seem obvious and familiar. A simple reminder to avoid them may be all you need. Of course, the list is not exhaustive; you may also want to add to it. When you do, please share your insights with your colleagues. 

Teaching for Knowledge or Building Skills: When to Choose

Teaching for Knowledge or Building Skills: When to Choose

When designing learning experiences, we face a crucial question: Do we primarily want students to know something, or do we want them to do something? Should the focus be on content they will need to absorb or on skills we want them to develop? Our answers to these questions should guide our decision about the best instructional approach. 

It goes without saying that learning often—maybe even mostly—involves a combination approach, but sometimes the focal point needs to be on one or the other. At times, we need to build context and activate background knowledge to create a foundation for learning. At other times, we want students to build specific competencies and practice crucial skills. These two approaches are, respectively, commonly known as content-focused instruction and skill-based instruction.  

As the names suggest, content-focused and skill-based instructional approaches serve related but separate goals. We might think of content-focused instruction as providing broad context, emphasizing concepts, and building a foundation for understanding. Content-focused instruction is more likely to emphasize content knowledge, facts, sequences, concepts, and procedures. Skill-based instruction, on the other hand, emphasizes analysis, problem solving, application, and communication. Skill-based instruction focuses more on competencies and processes that enable learners to apply what they are learning. Content-focused instruction aligns well with building foundational knowledge and intellectual development, while skill-based instruction emphasizes hands-on learning and the development of transferable skills. Both types of instruction are valuable, but they serve different priorities.  

Traditionally, skill-based instruction has been more closely linked to practical skill classes and job training, while content-focused instruction has been more associated with traditional academic classes. However, today’s students and the world they are preparing for require foundational knowledge and skills to apply what they learn practically. Equally important, students want to understand why they are learning and what they can do with that knowledge.  

So, how might content-focused and skill-based instruction look in practice, and how can we decide which approach fits best? Here are five considerations to guide us: 

  • What is our instructional goal? Do we primarily want students to acquire knowledge or use what they learn? In many instances, we might choose a content-focused approach to introduce a new concept or create a foundation for understanding context. Once the foundation is established, we might move to a skill-based approach to help students use what they have learned to solve problems, analyze relationships, or apply it in other ways 

  • How much do students already know? If we are introducing new information that students will need later, a content-focused approach may be best. If students are familiar with the context and purpose of what they are learning, a skill-based approach will likely advance their learning and sustain their motivation and engagement.  

  • What will students be expected to do with what they are learning? If theoretical knowledge, understanding concepts, and seeing relationships are goals, a content-focused approach makes senseIf students will be expected to analyze situations, participate in simulations, and demonstrate competency, a skill-based approach will likely be more successful.  

  • Is long-term learning retention and transfer crucial? General awareness and understanding can be generated through a content-focused approach. However, to ensure long-term retention and the ability to transfer learning to novel situations, a skill-based approach with frequent and spaced practice is likely to be a better choice.  

  • How will learning be assessed? If students will be expected to explain processes, sequence information, or draw conclusions, a content-focused approach may offer the best alignment. On the other hand, if students will be expected to demonstrate competencies, use new learning to solve problems, or analyze approaches, a skill-based approach is the better choice.  

Obviously, content-focused and skill-based instruction each has a role to play in the learning experiences we design for students. The key questions are, “What is our primary instructional goal?” and “What do we expect students to do with what they learn?” We might use a combination of approaches in some lessons or choose a single approach, depending on our students' readiness, the complexity of what they are learning, and how their learning will be assessed.