The Master Teacher Blog

The Master Teacher Blog
Providing you, the K-12 leader, with the help you need to lead with clarity, credibility, and confidence in the ever-evolving world of education.
Browse Topics
What Students Get Wrong About Learning—And How to Fix It

What Students Get Wrong About Learning—And How to Fix It

Learning is plagued by a surprising array of misconceptions. Some have roots in myths and traditions. Others grow out of common sayings that fail to capture the true nature of learning. Still others are reinforced by practices and exhortations we adopt to create shortcuts and make learning challenges easier to manage.  

Of course, students come to us with many of these misconceptions embedded in their assumptions, beliefs, and behaviors. Yet, what students think about learning can drive how they engage and influence their aspirations, effort, and persistence. Let’s examine seven of the most common misconceptions about learning, how they can get in the way of student success, and how we can counter them in our work with students.  

Misconception #1: Learning is taking in information. Obviously, learning involves becoming aware of and understanding information. However, being able to repeat or recite information is, at best, a first step in the learning process. Learning happens as students organize, connect, apply, and use what they are learning to gain new insights and generate new ideas.   

Counter conception: Learning is not what enters the brain. Learning is what you do with information once in the brain to understand, apply, and create.  

Misconception #2: Intelligence is more important than effort. Clearly, intelligence plays a role in learning. However, “being smart” is of little value if it is not supported by discipline, persistence, and application. On the other hand, consistently applied effort, good strategies, and focus can lead to more learning success than intelligence alone. In fact, research shows that people who develop and practice good work and learning habits are more successful in life than people who rely on natural intelligence.  

Counter conception: Good learners choose good strategies and give consistent, focused effort regardless of their natural talent.  

Misconception #3: Fast learning is good learning. Adults often inadvertently reinforce this misconception. We sometimes describe students who find learning easy as being smart. In fact, students who find learning easy are often good at memorizing, but they may not be able to recall much of what they learn. The saying “easy come, easy go,” applies here. Meanwhile, when students must struggle to grasp a concept or develop a skill, they are more likely to retain what they have learned. The brain connects effort to importance. Putting in significant effort can make what is learned easier to recall.   

Counter conception: Having to focus, practice, and invest in learning can make it stick longer than learning that comes easily.  

Misconception #4: Practice makes perfect. In the words of legendary football coach Vince Lombardi, “Practice does not make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect.” What is practiced becomes stronger and more deeply embedded in memory, including mistakes. Practice that improves performance includes attention to detail and technique, feedback, and successive adjustments.  

Counter conception: Deliberate, purposeful practice supported by feedback and adjustment supports progress toward perfection.   

Misconception #5: Forgetting is evidence of poor learning. Forgetting is a natural process the brain uses to let go of what it assumes is not important. If something is learned, but not practiced or used frequently, the brain lets it go in favor of what is used more often. If students want to remember something, they need to retrieve it or use it to keep it fresh. Interestingly, every time information and skills are retrieved, they embed themselves more deeply in memory and become easier to recall in the future.  

Counter conception: Forgetting is natural, but we remember what we revisit and refresh. The more we retrieve and use information, the longer we will retain it.  

Misconception #6: Tests signal the end of learning. This misconception makes sense when students see the purpose of learning as preparing for a test. When the test is finished, what was learned no longer seems to have a purpose. Consequently, they often quickly forget what they have learned. On the other hand, when students learn to gain knowledge, influence, capability, and life options, retaining what they learn remains a priority. We can help students remember what they have learned by engaging them in frequent review and retrieval practice, and by designing activities that require students to use prior learning to accomplish new tasks and understand new concepts.  

Counter conception: Assessments are measures of progress and mastery. However, the purpose and value of learning reside in what is retained and can be used long after the test is over. 

Misconception #7: If I cannot learn it today, I cannot learn it. Students often believe that if they try something and are not successful, it is evidence that they cannot be successful. Yet most complex, challenging skills are developed over time. Not achieving immediate success means more work is needed, not that success isn’t possible.  

Counter conception: By learning from mistakes, focusing on progress, and using feedback, what seems impossible today can be within reach tomorrow. “Not yet” does not mean “not possible.”  

Misconceptions about how learning happens and what makes learning remain accessible are common, but they are not inevitable. Taking time to help students dispel assumptions and adjust their beliefs about learning can reap rich rewards while students are with us and can help to prepare them for a life of learning success.

Simplify Your Teaching, Amplify Student Learning

Simplify Your Teaching, Amplify Student Learning

We have a lot to say and much to share with our students, especially at this time of the year. We want students to hear, understand, and absorb as much as possible during their time with us. We may fear that we will overlook something, not explain something, or not give students enough. Consequently, we may spend our days sharing, explaining, directing, and repeating so that students are exposed to everything they need.  

Yet, there is danger in saying too much, giving too much, and even repeating too much. In fact, we are likely to be more successful in our instruction, and students are likely to be more successful in their learning, when we say less, focus more, and create more space for students to think, share, and explore.  

We might borrow from the philosophical principle of parsimony, which focuses on what is essential and avoids making things more complicated or difficult than necessary. It is true that teaching requires nuance and features complexity, but teaching and other forms of communication are most effective when the focus is on achieving their purpose while employing the fewest words, ideas, assumptions, and distractions. 

So how might the principle of parsimony be applied in our work? Admittedly, what to cut, trim, and avoid can be challenging. We may have to shift some focus, avoid some habits, and adjust some practices, but the increases we see in learning and the reduction we experience in our stress and our workload will be more than worth the effort. Here are six examples to consider and build on.  

Say less and let students think, talk, and learn more. As teachers, we typically like to talk. That is why we chose a profession that is highly dependent on communication. However, our inclination to speak—especially excessively—can get in the way of students’ learning and independence. When we engage in excessive talking, students have less time to think and learn. We might ask ourselves whether what we are about to say is something students could discover on their own. Is it something we should position as a discussion rather than a statement? Or might students reflect and explain to each other? There is a saying that the person who is learning the most in a classroom is the person who is speaking the most and working the hardest. That person should not be us.  

Clear the conversational clog. We might believe that lengthy, detailed explanations lead to more understanding, but students are more likely to grasp and recall what we say if we are succinct. Similarly, limiting the number of instructions we give can reduce the cognitive load students experience and can lead to fewer misunderstandings and mistakes. Breaking procedures into manageable chunks, giving one instruction at a time, and checking to see that students are ready before moving to the next instruction can significantly reduce confusion, off-task behavior, and requests for clarification and repetition.  

Replace repetition with precision. When students do not understand or are confused by our instruction or explanation, we can be tempted to simply repeat what we said, often louder and with more emphasis. Yet, repeating what led to misunderstanding or confusion holds limited promise of improving the situation. Everyone’s interests are better served by our reflecting on what may have created the condition. We might ask ourselves if we were clear, whether we emphasized what is most important, or if we need to offer a better, more precise example. We might also check to be certain students are listening before attempting to clear up the communication. The truth is that one clear direction or explanation is more effective than several repeated but confusing ones, especially when students are not paying attention. 

Reduce the rules, increase the commitments. We might be tempted to create a long list of rules to cover any behavior and situation we can imagine. However, once the rules are created, we need to ensure that they are followed. We need to teach each rule, monitor behavior to ensure compliance, and manage consequences for violations. Rather than creating a difficult-to-manage system, we might engage students in a discussion of what is necessary to create and maintain a learning-supportive environment and then focus on identifying commitments for everyone to follow. For example, simple commitments like respect yourself, respect others, and respect learning can cover a wide range of situations and position students and us to focus on why behaviors are not acceptable rather than defaulting to a long list of rules. 

Cut cognitive clutter. We want the learning environment to be attractive and stimulating. We also want students to have plenty of materials and resources to support their learning. However, this goal can be compromised by too much of a good thing. Excessive posters, pictures, diagrams, and other wall decorations can become distracting for students. Similarly, too many slides and handouts for every activity can create competition for students’ attention. Before posting and providing support visuals and other resources, we might ask ourselves whether they are worthy supports for learning or just additional decorations. The more we reduce cognitive clutter, the better students can focus on what matters most.   

Focus feedback on the essentials. We can be tempted to make every correction on students’ work and unload all our ideas about how they can improve. We might think that we need to share everything we know to make their performance perfect. Yet students rarely make positive changes in their work when presented with long lists of corrections. Rather than trying to include everything in our feedback, we might reinforce one or two important strengths or areas of progress and focus on one or two things that would make the greatest positive difference. If we are concerned that someone reviewing our feedback might conclude that we fail to see other areas in need of improvement, we might note in our written feedback or as a side comment that we are confining our feedback to essential elements to provide focused support rather than comprehensive corrections.  

A final thought: Our goal is not to oversimplify complex concepts and ideas. Rather, we need to remove unnecessary complications while preserving essential complexities. We want students to wrestle with difficult content and concepts, but not become bogged down with unnecessary confusion, distraction, and redundancy. 

Five Emotions that Drive Meaningful Learning

Five Emotions that Drive Meaningful Learning

We might not always think of learning as being an emotionally driven process, but when we attempt to divorce emotions from learning, we diminish the process and lessen its value. Learning is not just a matter of memorization and repetition, although these processes can help students to retain what they learn. When learning is pursued without emotion and purpose, what is gained is soon lost, and what should be valued too often is abandoned in favor of what comes next. 

Unfortunately, many emotions associated with learning are not always comfortable or pleasant, yet their presence can make learning meaningful, rewarding, and empowering. When learning is accompanied by strong emotions, what is learned is more likely to be embedded in memory, recalled with greater ease, and applied with greater understanding and insight.  

Obviously, students can experience many emotions as they tread the path of learning. However, five emotions appear to play especially significant roles. Let’s explore these five emotions and their roles in the learning process.  

Curiosity. The best and most lasting learning begins with an unanswered question, an interesting possibility, or an unexplained phenomenon. Curiosity opens the mind and directs attention, two key conditions for inviting and supporting learning. Learning that responds to curiosity feels voluntary rather than imposed. Curiosity stimulates our brains to release dopamine (the pleasure chemical) and helps to increase focus and prepare for memory building.  

Teachers can create and leverage curiosity for learning by: 

  • Asking questions that students find compelling and relevant. 

  • Designing activities that build interest without giving answers. 

  • Providing partial information that invites further investigation. 

  • Telling an intriguing story with a surprising ending—or no ending at all.  

  • Demonstrating a phenomenon or sharing an experience that invites additional discovery and explanation.  

Confusion. Confusion signals that more organization, understanding, or information is needed. It's the brain’s way of telling us that what we know is not enough or is not organized in a manner to give us the answers we seek. Confusion is not failure. In fact, it is an important step toward understanding. Students often need this reminder and some coaching to maintain learning momentum.  

Teachers can support students through times of confusion by: 

  • Preparing them for it, normalizing it, and reassuring them that their confusion is evidence of learning progress. 

  • Coaching them to describe and explain what they find confusing. Often, students find their way through confusion when they put their experiences into words.  

  • Promoting and supporting productive struggle as a key strategy for learning difficult things.  

  • Helping them determine whether they are confused and need clarity and sensemaking or if they are overwhelmed. When students are overwhelmed, we may need to help them break down tasks and sequence steps.  

Frustration. Frustration is a signal that new learning is stretching current competence. It is evidence that focus and effort are required to overcome a challenge, and it can also be a message that it is time to identify and apply another strategy. Frustration is often the final step before learning breakthroughs.  

Teachers can help students to understand and persist through frustration by: 

  • Reassuring them that when they feel stuck, they are on the threshold of a learning breakthrough.  

  • Reminding them that learning is supposed to be hard.  

  • Helping them break learning tasks into smaller chunks and identify progress markers. 

  • Providing hints and resources rather than answers. 

Hope. Hope sustains motivation and encourages persistence. However, hope is most impactful for learning when students ground their hope in their ability to succeed through their efforts, not their talents. Hope reinforces students’ confidence that if they keep trying, they will improve and eventually succeed. Hope is not a measure of capability; it is evidence of confidence, and confidence that success is possible drives persistence.  

Teachers can nurture and reinforce hope by: 

  • Designing, reinforcing, and celebrating early wins, 

  • Creating progress markers to show growth. 

  • Using the language of “not yet” to remind students that success is possible. 

  • Having students recall times in the past when they struggled and eventually succeeded.  

  • Sharing our confidence in our students’ ability to face and overcome adversity. 

Pride. Pride that is earned through effort and persistence can provide a major boost to confidence in future learning. However, students need to see the connection between their actions and successful outcomes. When success results from controllable factors, students begin to see themselves as learners capable of mastering difficult tasks. Learning success can also foster intrinsic motivation and encourage risk-taking related to learning. 

Teachers can help students build and experience earned pride by: 

  • Encouraging students to reflect on the steps they took and the strategies they used to be successful.  

  • Reinforcing with students that their learning resulted from controllable factors.  

  • Marking and celebrating important progress and success events to reinforce the significance of what students have accomplished. 

  • Having students share what they have learned with or teach other students.  

  • Using language with students that reinforces their identity as a skilled learner.  

Without question, emotions play a crucial role in learning, especially when it is hard. By recognizing, reinforcing, and leveraging emotions as part of learning, we can help students to normalize struggle and frustration, maintain hope, and take pride in what they accomplish. Are there other emotions that you might add to this list as instrumental in designing successful learning experiences? 

When Our Expertise Becomes a Liability

When Our Expertise Becomes a Liability

Expertise is not easy to build. It requires years of study, extensive practice, and sustained focus. Expertise in a content area is built on deep understanding, well-established knowledge constructs, and well-honed schema to address complex problems. Without question, this type of expertise is a great asset.

However, content expertise can also create challenges in our work with students. In fact, in some circumstances, expertise can be a liability. The depth and complexity of what we know can make it difficult to grasp where students are early in their learning journey. We can forget what it was like to be a novice learner.

We must sometimes look beyond our expertise to see what students need and discern how best to meet their needs. Information that seems obvious to us can be anything but obvious to new learners. We can make assumptions that overlook important information and procedural components for early learning. We can underestimate the time, effort, and support students will require. Let’s examine six times when our expertise ceases to be an asset and instead becomes a liability.

Expertise can reduce flexibility. Students come with varied levels of background knowledge and readiness to learn. They often require varied learning experiences and pacing to succeed. However, the process of honing a skill can lead to overreliance on a single method—a method that has worked for the teacher. High levels of competence can lead to overdependence on a strategy or practice that has seemed to work well in the past.  

Antidote: Consider what students need before choosing a strategy or approach.  

Expertise can result in high expectations without support. Years of experience and gained expertise can lead to assumptions about how easily a skill or concept can be learned. Consequently, important scaffolding elements can be overlooked, leaving students struggling to understand key steps and gain insights crucial to learning success. 

Antidote: Listen carefully to students’ questions, identify recurring areas of struggle, and offer scaffolding where needed.  

Expertise can create instructional blind spots. Expertise is a result of extensive practice that leads to automated skills. High levels of expertise can lead to ignoring key initial learning elements, overlooking misconceptions learners hold, and presenting information in “chunks” too large for students to digest.  

Antidote: Adopt a beginner’s mindset. Imagine having no knowledge or experience when planning steps and sequences to build learning paths.  

Expertise can generate overconfidence. With expertise comes a deserved level of confidence. However, too much confidence can inhibit reflection, create resistance to feedback, and result in reluctance to innovate. Certainty can be both a gift and a curse.  

Antidote: Balance (deserved) confidence with humility.  

Expertise can underestimate emotional barriers. Student experiences play significant roles in their learning. Past trauma, current worries, and anxieties about the future can all affect what students learn and how well they learn it. Cultural context and personal perceptions matter. The best instructional strategies and deepest content knowledge may not overcome the barriers that students’ emotions can pose to their learning.   

Antidote: Be open, sensitive, and considerate of the emotions students may be experiencing when designing and facilitating learning activities.  

Expertise can unintentionally create cognitive overload. Experts tend to think in large informational and conceptual chunks. They understand relationships and sequences. However, students often experience new learning content as disconnected elements. Their working memory can quickly and easily be overwhelmed. When working memory is overloaded, little learning occurs, and even less is remembered. 

Antidote: Break information and processes into small elements, provide schema and graphic representations, and ensure adequate time for reflection and application of new learning. 

Content expertise can be a great gift to our teaching. It can also get in the way if we come to rely too heavily on what we know over what students need. The challenge is to embrace our expertise while remembering what it felt like to be a novice learner. When we inject humility, empathy, and curiosity into our teaching and relationships with students, we both become more successful.

Six Strategies to Inspire the Next Generation of Teachers

Six Strategies to Inspire the Next Generation of Teachers

Few schools across the nation have all the teachers they need and can be confident that they will have a wealth of quality candidates for future openings. Too few of today’s young people are choosing teaching as a career to fill current and future needs, which means that we need to do all that we can to make teaching and other education roles attractive and rewarding. Despite their importance, these steps will fall short if young people are not exposed to and supported to choose teaching as a career.  

Research points to the reality that tomorrow’s teachers are sitting in our classrooms today. Most teachers in most schools grew up near where they began their teaching careers. It follows that if we can interest and support students with high potential and an inclination toward teaching to explore what it means to teach, we are more likely to have the quality, number, and variety of teaching candidates we need and seek. However, we must do more than occasionally encourage students to think about teaching. An intentional, comprehensive, and varied approach is required—that's where Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs can be so immensely valuable. Here are six strategies to consider and build on.  

Offer a paraeducator certification program.  

A structured program that leads to paraeducator/paraprofessional certification can give students a strong foundation in various aspects of learning and working with learners. Mini courses on topics such as child development, effective classroom practices, and the science of learning can provide a solid foundation for students to serve as paraeducators while also helping them see themselves as future teachers. Observing and assisting in classrooms can also give students an intimate experience of teaching as both a role and a career. Experience as paraeducators also positions students to observe teaching from a perspective other than as a student. Further, a structured program can expose students to the thinking and decision-making processes of professional teachers.  

Provide paid internships and apprenticeships.  

Roles such as classroom aides, summer teaching assistants, and after-school tutors can offer authentic opportunities for students to “try on” teaching roles. Having the experiences paid for also adds value and responsibility to them. Internships and apprenticeships can also expose students to a wide range of challenges and experiences that reflect what it means to be a teacher.   

Create opportunities for students to engage in micro- and peer-teaching.  

Some less-intensive options for students to experience what it means to teach can be attractive to students who are curious about teaching and want to try it out but either do not have time for or are not yet ready for more intensive experiences. Micro- and peer-teaching also entail lower investment and risk for students who are curious but unsure of their interests.   

Offer dual credit courses to give students a college head start.  

Courses that offer high school and college credit can be a great option for students who are certain that teaching is in their future. Not only are students exposed to more advanced content and skills, but credits earned prior to college enrollment can reduce tuition costs and build momentum for students’ preparation for a career in teaching.  

Offer mentorships with strong, supportive, and inspiring teachers.  

Having opportunities to engage with and learn from someone who is passionate about and an expert in their work can help students gain a positive, realistic view of what it means to teach. Mentors can also advise students on areas of experience and learning that will help them to be better prepared for teaching as a profession.  

Sponsor a future teacher club.  

Clubs for students interested in teaching were once common in schools. However, their popularity has waned over the past few decades. Nevertheless, an organization designed around student interests, with opportunities for student leadership and experiences that students find appealing, can support students considering a career in teaching. Students might engage in activities such as lesson design, visiting and observing classes, hosting teacher panels, and conducting interviews. Participation in a future teacher club can also give students a sense of identity and stimulate pride in their career interest.  

The truth is that tomorrow’s teachers are sitting in today’s classrooms waiting to be noticed, nurtured, and prepared. When they have meaningful opportunities to experience teaching, learn from skilled mentors, and see the impact they can have on others, something magical happens: Teaching shifts from something they observe to a future they can imagine.

Beyond Hand Raising: Smarter Ways to Ask Questions

Beyond Hand Raising: Smarter Ways to Ask Questions

We employ questions throughout lessons to gain feedback on our instruction, surface areas of confusion and misconception, and to support classroom management. Having students respond to questions is a useful strategy for understanding what background knowledge they bring and what they are learning in real time. Questions can also be used to ensure that students are paying attention.  

Of course, we want our questions to be well-framed, meaningful, and revealing of what students are absorbing and can explain. However, how we pose questions also has implications for the information we gain and the psychological comfort students experience. For example, when students are wondering whether they are about to be called upon, they may pay more attention. When students have time to reflect and prepare answers, they are more likely to respond with information that better reflects their thinking and learning.  

Obviously, there are many ways to manage the process of asking questions. Each approach can serve a purpose and has advantages and disadvantages. And each varies in the amount of preparation allowed to students, the predictability with which questions are presented, and the amount of emotional safety students experience.  

The three most common questioning strategies are cold calling, warm calling, and signal calling. Let’s examine these three popular strategies, what they offer, and the drawbacks they can present.  

Cold calling involves asking students questions without a specific, individual warning that they may be called upon. Teachers may pause a lesson to ask questions or set aside time after a lesson or activity for students to respond. The purpose of this approach is to keep students cognitively engaged in anticipation of being asked a question. It also allows for random checking of understanding and prevents a few students from dominating participation. Cold calling can also be used to hold students accountable and gain the attention of students who appear not to be paying attention. While this approach offers opportunities for feedback and management, it can negatively affect students' emotional safety, especially those who need time to reflect and prepare before sharing their thinking. It can also be a source of anxiety and embarrassment that pushes against authentic engagement and “full-bodied” learning.  

Strategies to make cold calling effective: 

  • Ensure a warm and respectful tone in questioning and follow-up. 

  • Respond with interest and curiosity to incorrect responses. 

  • Offer supportive prompts to nudge and expand responses in a productive direction. 

  • Treat mistakes as a natural part of learning and a step toward understanding. 

  • Avoid overuse of cold calls to maintain attention and manage other behaviors.   

Warm calling is a softer, more supportive approach to questioning. Typically, students are given time and activities to help them prepare to answer questions. As examples, students may take a minute to make notes or consult with classmates before being expected to respond. This approach shares accountability with cold calling, but involves less risk-taking, lower threat, fewer non-responses, and increased student confidence. For many students, this approach leads to deeper and more complete responses. It can also support shy, less confident, and struggling students to feel more successful. Further, the additional thinking time and rehearsal increase retention of new learning.  

Strategies to make warm calling effective: 

  • Allocate adequate, but not excessive, time for reflection and preparation. 

  • Pose questions that are more complex and require more reflective and analytical thinking than might be presented when cold calling.  

  • Offer response preparation strategies that maintain individual accountability while also mining memories and stimulating deep thinking.  

  • Press for more complete responses than might be acceptable when cold calling. 

  • Monitor to ensure that a small group of students does not dominate preparation activities and response opportunities.  

Signal calling, as the name implies, involves visible indicators to assess and assign question response activities. Signaling might be used to indicate who is confident and ready to respond, or who is uncertain or needs more time. This approach also provides real-time feedback on how well students are tracking with the lesson. Signal calling features accountability, but in this context, students share information about their learning and readiness during the activity. A variety of signaling techniques can be employed. Students might use hand signals such as thumbs up/thumbs down/thumbs sideways or “fist-to-five” confidence ratings to signal their readiness. They might use colored cards, whiteboards, or other strategies. Information students provide can guide choices about which students might be selected to respond. 

Strategies to make signal calling effective: 

  • Keep signal choices simple and clear to avoid confusion. 

  • Explore student signals that reflect uncertainty or confusion to determine causes. 

  • Balance response distribution to avoid having only confident students respond. 

  • Monitor signals to ensure that students are not “hiding” or following peer responses to avoid thinking independently. 

  • Combine signal-calling with follow-up questions to examine the depth of understanding and readiness to move forward.  

The three questioning strategies discussed all present advantages and disadvantages depending on the type of learning involved and our purpose in presenting questions. In general, signal calling works best to gauge student readiness. Warm calling supports deeper participation. Cold calling can maintain engagement and accountability. The key is to match the strategy we choose with the purpose of our instruction and the learning-related information we need. 

Share Your Tips & Stories

Share your story and the tips you have for getting through this challenging time. It can remind a fellow school leader of something they forgot, or your example can make a difficult task much easier and allow them to get more done in less time. We may publish your comments.
Send Us An Email
Before Teaching Content, Teach Students How to Learn

Before Teaching Content, Teach Students How to Learn

We want our students to be successful learners. We also want to experience success as we teach students. Unfortunately, students do not always come to us with the attitudes and skills that make them proficient learners. Trying to teach students who lack an understanding of how learning happens and how to be successful learners can be a challenging and exhausting experience.  

We have a choice: We can ignore the understanding and skills students lack, or we can help them to build the learning capacity necessary to become better learners. Fortunately, there are several accessible and effective strategies and insights we can share with students to start them on a more successful learning journey. Equally important, we can teach many of these lessons in the context of daily routines and the required curriculum.  

Here are six research-based and practice-proven learning insights to help students strengthen their learning and expand their capacity to succeed in school and in life. Key insight: If we position the insights and skills that build learning capacity in the context of helping students rather than class requirements, students are often more accepting and more readily adopt these practices. We might even frame behaviors that support learning as experiments and games to prove their worth.  

First, teach students how learning changes the brain. Students are often not aware of how experiences, repetition, feedback, and even failed attempts change the way their brain functions. New experiences, insights, and skills create neural connections and strengthen existing ones. The more often these connections are activated, the stronger, more efficient, and more durable they become. The brain pays attention to repetition, so practice is a great way to grow brain capacity. Focused, deliberate practice, followed by feedback and subsequent adjustments, grows the brain’s capacity and can make future learning more efficient.  

Second, help students understand the role of attention in learning. We might assume that students understand that paying attention is a primary driver of learning, yet too often, this is not the case. Attention is the gateway to learning and the doorway to memory. In the absence of attention, little or no learning is likely to happen. Students can increase their attention skills by employing strategies such as eliminating distractions, focusing on one attention-demanding task at a time, asking questions, and predicting what happens next in lessons, stories, and other learning activities. We might also have students monitor their attention and challenge themselves to gradually lengthen the time they can stay fully attentive and engaged.  

Third, instruct students about how their memory functions. The truth is that forgetting is normal. It is not a sign of failure. However, memory can be strengthened and lengthened. When students frequently return to previously learned information and skills, they become more deeply embedded in their memory. Retrieval practice—where students attempt to recall everything they remember about a topic or process—refreshes their memory and lengthens their recall. They might explain ideas in their own words. Or they might connect new ideas and content to prior learning. Engaging in memory challenges is far more effective than passive review.  

Fourth, explain the value of productive struggle. Students often assume that if they struggle as they learn, they must not be good learners. Yet learning that is easy often does not stay with students long. When students must struggle to grasp a concept or develop a skill, they are more likely to retain it once learned. Mistakes are also a natural part of learning, and they represent information the brain uses to improve future performance. We can counsel students to think “not yet” when they struggle rather than “not possible.” We might also remind them that confusion and struggle often happen just before understanding and success. 

Fifth, coach students to focus on getting better, not just getting it right. We can remind students that learning is a process, not a performance. Students often do their best when they think about learning as a journey, not a one-time effort and demonstration. Challenging learning more often follows a path of iteration and approximation than a track of error-free certainty. We can help students set learning goals and monitor their progress. We might even encourage students to interrogate their learning: What strategy worked well? What mistakes helped me to learn? What should I practice more or next? 

Sixth, nurture the skill of metacognition. The value of the previous five learning skills is enhanced when students learn to monitor their own thinking. Metacognition gives students the power to become their own best teacher. We might teach students to ask themselves: What do I understand about this topic or skill, and where do I still need to do more? Can I explain or teach this information to someone else? Where am I confused? What strategy might work better than the one I have used? Metacognition is a skill that positions students to regulate their attention, manage their effort, choose the best strategy, and take ownership and control of their learning.  

These skills help students not only be successful in our class, but they also can be life changing. Students begin to see themselves as self-directed, capable, independent learners. When students possess and practice these skills, they can also become easier and more delightful to teach. 

Five Practices to Build Early-Year Momentum

Five Practices to Build Early-Year Momentum

Once the school year is underway, we face the challenge of establishing routines, setting a pace, and creating a rhythm to carry our instruction and, by extension, student learning forward. We may be eager to introduce the curriculum and move forward with what we have to share with students, but success with these priorities depends on creating a solid context and processes to support what lies ahead. 

A successful launch to the new year will require some patience, discipline, and focus from us. Time spent in the first weeks of school helping students practice routines, develop confidence, and refresh their learning can make our work with students in the coming weeks and months significantly more successful. Let’s review five start-of-the-year practices that can position our students and us for success in the year ahead. 

Observe before expecting. We may have ideas and hold assumptions about what students should know and be able to do, but we must remember that what students bring to our classroom may vary widely due to a number of factors. Some students may not have fully grasped past learning or may have forgotten much of what they have learned. They may have had a summer filled with distractions and trauma. Or they may have engaged in activities that accelerated their knowledge and built new skills. The truth is that students will begin the year where they are, not where we expect or want them to be. By taking time to observe what students know, how they behave, and what they may be ready to learn, we can gain insights that inform our planning and guide our instruction in the coming weeks.  

Prioritize progress over perfection. We want students to find success. Yet, we need to remember that learning is a journey. Perfection may be a goal, but expecting perfection can be a recipe for frustration and disappointment—for our students and for us. The gap between where students are and where they are going will be closed by effort and progress. We need not lose sight of where we want to take students, but we must be realistic about the length and nature of the journey. Prioritizing progress is a better strategy than expecting perfection, especially in the first few weeks.  

Go slow to go fast. The beginning of the new year, those first few weeks when we meet and begin getting to know our students, is the time to focus on building a foundation for the rest of the year. Relationships built in the initial weeks can create a foundation of trust and reassurance that can prevent future resistance and conflict while building cooperation and commitment. Time spent refreshing concepts and renewing skills can save time and frustration later as students encounter more complex ideas and build new capacities. We may worry that we are off to a slow start, but momentum fueled by confidence and competence can easily make up for lost time.  

Repeat to automate. Students do their best when they know what is expected and when they are comfortable and confident with routines. We may think that a few repetitions should be adequate for students to learn and follow daily procedures, but when students are still trying to find their place and hoping to fit in, this type of learning can take longer than we expect. Rather than place a number on how many times we will explain and repeat, we might continue until students no longer need reminding. While getting started may take longer than we anticipate, well-established routines and expectations can pay rich dividends as the year unfolds.  

Assume positive efforts and intentions. Student behavior in the opening weeks may be erratic and unpredictable. Some students will withdraw until they feel a sense of belonging. Other students will act out and even be defiant until they feel assured in their relationship with us. Still others may test our boundaries and expectations until they are confident that we are serious and will follow through. In response to these varying and sometimes confusing behaviors, seeking to understand the reasons behind the behaviors we see will be more productive than drawing premature conclusions or assuming the worst of students. Unfortunately, when what we assume and expect is negative, we are more likely to encounter more negativity. Students often need time and a fresh start. We can help by assuming students’ intentions are positive—or at least suspending judgment until we have more experience with them.  

There is much to do and think about in the initial weeks of the new school year. We might find ourselves wanting to immediately launch into the curriculum and leave relationship building, routines, and expectations for later, yet this is usually a mistake. Trying to correct and undo unacceptable and unproductive behaviors and processes usually takes more time and effort than establishing a strong foundation from the beginning. 

Six Ways to Help Students Connect School to Their Future

Six Ways to Help Students Connect School to Their Future

Because many (if not most or all) educators also consider themselves to be lifelong lovers of learning, it’s only natural that we want to believe that students inherently understand why school is important and that what they learn in school holds value. Yet, the evidence suggests something different. Too many students see school as something they must get through to get on with life rather than an experience that will take them where they want to go.  

Every time a student asks, “Why do we have to learn this?” “When will I ever use this?” and “Is this going to count?” we are likely being presented with evidence that students do not see their school experience as valuable, purposeful, or alignment with their goals. As a result, their motivation too often remains largely untapped, their engagement is generally limited to what is demanded, and their commitment becomes driven by external rewards and meaningless symbols. 

On the other hand, when students connect their school experience to their interests and see it as purposeful and aligned with their goals, their motivation and engagement grow. Their commitment and persistence become stronger, and learning becomes a higher priority.  

The challenge we face is to employ strategies and approaches that help students to make the crucial connection between what they are asked to learn and what is important, interesting, useful, or worthwhile to them. The task is not easy, nor will the same strategies and approaches work in the same way or for every student. We need a variety of options and alternatives to make the connection in response to students' needs. Here are six strategies we can tap, test, and refine to take on the challenge. 

Learn and tap into student aspirations.  

If we hope to have students see alignment between their goals and in-school learning, we need to start where our students are. We need to understand their hopes, aspirations, interests, and desired identity. For example, they may like making things, helping others, leading teams, solving problems, or earning money. Of course, these elements may change over time, but taking time to ask students about what they hope for in life, the work they enjoy, the skills they are interested in, and who they hope to become can provide a rich context and anchors for learning.    

Frequently return to “Why does this matter?”  

When students do not understand the value and purpose of what they are learning, they typically default to what “will count” as a grade. Students need us to choose learning that matters and help them to see why. Frequently reminding students of the importance and real-world application of what they are learning can build stronger bridges between student goals and their school experience.  

Help students see possibilities for skill transfer.  

The more students understand how what they are learning in one class might be helpful in another or in life beyond school, the more likely they are to invest the time and effort to learn it. Broadening our explanation and discussion of what students are learning to include skills such as critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity, persistence, and other crucial life skills opens doors to examples of how these skills can be applied in contexts beyond the current lesson or unit of study. Supplementing the discussion with examples of how these skills are used in a variety of settings and professions can further help students to make meaningful connections.  

Reinforce links between today’s choices and future opportunities.  

Students often struggle to link the decisions they make today to how those decisions will affect their future options and opportunities. One way to assist students in grasping this concept is to help them create an “if-then” chain. For example, if they do quality work today, success in their courses becomes more likely. If they succeed in their courses, then graduation is a higher probability and post-graduation options grow. If they create more post-graduation options, then they open more career opportunities. And if they have access to more career opportunities, then success with personal goals becomes more likely. Another approach is to emphasize to students the importance of consistently doing just one more thing than required. Over time, the difference between what would have been and what is possible grows in the same way that investing money creates even more money in the future.  

Connect learning to experiences of successful adults.  

Adults in the community, famous people, and even historical figures can serve as examples and reinforcers of the importance and value of what students are learning and the achievement of their goals. Consider inviting successful adults from the community to share their stories and examples of how what students are learning is important to their success in life. Similarly, we might share examples of how people whom students see as successful depend on the skills students are learning, which can reinforce connections to their goals. Further, selecting and highlighting historical figures who demonstrated habits and skills students are learning, and how they made them successful, can reinforce the alignment between students’ goals and in-school learning.  

Link learning to future identity.  

Helping students think about how they want to be seen and what they want to accomplish in the future can create opportunities for important discussions. We can remind students that success can be defined in multiple ways and that it can take many paths. What is most important is that they avoid closing doors they may want to reopen later and that they create and protect as many options in life as possible. 

We want students to see school as a place where they can build the knowledge, skills, habits, and character to pursue their goals and find success in life, not a collection of disjointed, disconnected, and distracting experiences. When they do, they become less dependent on external rewards and meaningless symbols and more focused on experiences that make them better people and prepare them for a better future. 

Six Assumptions That Can Shortchange Learning

Six Assumptions That Can Shortchange Learning

Our assumptions can have a powerful influence on what we see, how we interpret, and how we respond to what happens in our classroom and our interactions with students. When our assumptions are correct, this process can increase efficiency and improve our effectiveness. Unfortunately, when our assumptions are incorrect, they can launch a narrative that can lead to misunderstanding, misdiagnosis, and unproductive—and even harmful—responses. 

We might think of our assumptions as stories we tell ourselves that can drive our beliefs and actions. We carry them with us in our interactions, decisions, and relationships. These narratives are typically shaped by what we have been told, our experiences, our perceptions of students, and our perspective on our work. 

We need to be aware of assumptions we hold, regularly test them, and be willing to adjust them when they fall short. Here are seven of the most common assumptions that can get in the way of our success with students. Do any of these assumptions sound familiar? 

I must be in control, or students will not learn.  

This story assumes that learning is based on compliance. In fact, quality learning requires students to build ownership and engage in sense-making. These are processes that we can facilitate, but students must perform for themselves. When students have choices and a voice in learning, they are more likely to develop understanding, agency, and recall. Learning over which students feel no control tends not to be deep, nor is it retained for very long. 

Good teaching means that students should not struggle.  

This assumption sets a very high, even unrealistic standard for teaching. In fact, even if we meet it, we may not be doing a learning favor for students. Learning that comes too easily is often forgotten quickly. Struggle is often a key element in learning that is deep and lasting. We need to be ready to coach, guide, and support students in their learning, but preventing them from any struggle can deprive students of experiencing learning in ways that make it durable, transferable, and retainable. 

These students do not care.  

It may be that students are not responding to the way in which learning is being presented, or it may be that something is getting in the way. Though some of it certainly is, not all student disengagement is apathy. In fact, it may be a signal that something is interfering. What we are seeing might be confusion, uncertainty, or evidence of being overwhelmed. Of course, it might be a signal that students are not connecting with the content or our approach. Fortunately, we can adjust either or both factors. While we may not reach every student every day, we can do our best to maintain high expectations and use what we know about our students to position learning for the best chances of success. 

These students cannot handle challenging work. 

This statement is more likely to reflect our judgment than students’ capacity to learn. Our expectations matter. When we hold high expectations and support students to meet them, they are more likely to do so. On the other hand, if we lower our expectations, we risk not exposing students to learning that is deep and rich. We deprive them of the possibility of achieving more than they have in the past. We also risk underestimating our potential to lift the learning of our students to new and expected heights.  

I must cover all the content. 

This assumption prioritizes pacing over understanding. Coverage does not usually lead to competence, and superficial exposure does not lead to learning success. Time and curriculum requirements are certainly pressures teachers face, despite us knowing that choosing to prioritize coverage risks fragile learning and quick forgetting. A better choice is to decide what learning is essential, or at least the highest priority, and focus on those concepts and skills, even if it means some other content might not be addressed. 

This is the way I have always done this, so it must work. 

This statement falls back on tradition as a predictor of correctness. In fact, the first part of this statement may be correct, but it does not mean that the second part is also. Just because something worked in the past does not mean that it is the best approach today. The students we are teaching may have changed. Expectations may have shifted. Or some other factor may have been altered. The key is to focus on the needs, readiness, and characteristics of the students in front of us and ask what will work for them. 

We want our students to succeed. We also want to be confident in our ability to make their success possible. Consequently, we need to be thoughtful about the assumptions we make and their impact on our teaching and our students’ learning. Are there other assumptions you would add to this list? If so, what impact might they have on students and learning?